Massons

Queensland – COVID-19 – Retail Shop Leases and Other Commercial Leases Regulation

Written by Ben Malone on June 2, 2020

The Retail Shop Leases and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19 Emergency Response) Regulation 2020 (QLD) (QLD Regulations) came into effect on 28 May 2020.

The QLD Regulations largely mirror similar laws introduced by other States and Territories to implement the National Cabinet’s Code of Conduct for commercial tenancies, however there are a number of important differences that QLD landlords and tenants will need to be aware of.

Who is an affected lessee?

The QLD Regulations apply to “affected lessees”, being a tenant under a commercial or retail lease where the tenant has a turnover of less than $50M and is eligible for JobKeeper.  For the purposes of the turnover test, if the tenant is an entity connected with (or an affiliate of) another entity it will be the aggregate annual turnover of those entities.

If an affected lessee breaches the lease by ceasing trade or not paying rent/outgoings (wholly or partly) during the period 29 March 2020 to 30 September 2020, a landlord is prevented from (amongst other things) doing or continuing the following actions:

  • evicting / re-entering / terminating
  • seeking damages
  • charging interest
  • drawing on lease security
  • enforcing a personal guarantee or indemnity in a lease

unless the landlord has made a genuine attempt to negotiate and the tenant has substantially failed to comply with the negotiation process.  Rent also cannot be increased during this period (except turnover rent).

Negotiation process

The QLD Regulations impose obligations on landlords and tenants to cooperate and act in good faith in all discussions and actions associated with mitigating the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on each other.

Either party can trigger the renegotiation process and, once triggered, the parties must both give each other information relating to the request that is true, accurate and sufficient to enable the parties to negotiate in a fair and transparent way.

The QLD Regulations helpfully give examples of the information required, namely turnover information, evidence of JobKeeper eligibility and details of steps the tenant has taken to mitigate the effects of the pandemic.  A tenant may also apply for further rent reduction if circumstances materially worsen after an initial agreement is reached – but notably, they do not deal with the alternate scenario of circumstances improving for the particular tenant.  Landlords should consider this issue in reaching and documenting any agreement with tenants.

Differences in the QLD Regulations

One of the most critical changes the QLD Regulations impose is that landlords must offer tenants an extension to the term of the lease on the same conditions as those contained in the lease equivalent to the period for which rent is waived or deferred.  The only exception to this absolute obligation is where the landlord would be in breach of another legal obligation in doing so, or if the landlord demonstrates that the lease cannot be extended because it intends to use the premises for a ‘commercial purpose of the landlord’.

Some other interesting differences about the QLD Regulations when compared to other jurisdictions:

  • they expressly apply to agreements for lease where the lease has not yet commenced or come into effect
  • whilst the other jurisdictions have regard to the turnover of a franchise operation at the franchisee level, for the purposes of determining whether turnover is under $50M, the QLD Regulation go further and state that if premises are leased to a franchisor and then subleased to a franchisee who is an affected lessee, the franchisor is also treated as being an ‘affected lessee’
  • deferrals must be offered over a minimum period of 2 years (but no more than 3 years)
  • the landlord’s rights in respect of a security deposit are preserved until such time as the deferred rent has been repaid – albeit the position is silent on bank guarantees which may have expiry dates
  • there is a strict 30 day timeframe for the landlord to formally offer the tenant a reduction once the negotiation process has been triggered and a party has provided “sufficient information” about the rent relief request
  • there is a much more prescriptive mediation and dispute resolution process for any disputes

Insights

Make Good Clauses

When reviewing the case of T&L Alexandria v Sharvain Facades (2023) the court ruled on a vague “make good” clause, where unclear wording led to a costly dispute over redecorating obligations. The key takeaway? Ambiguity in leases — especially around make-good clauses — can cause headaches. Be clear and specific in your contracts to avoid messy surprises.

December 16, 2024

HoAs – binding or not binding?

Be careful when asking for a “non-refundable” deposit in a heads of agreement that has all the hallmarks of a binding contract, it might just lock you in to the deal. In this case Mr. Patel paid a non-refundable $50,000 deposit under an HoA, and when the vendor withdrew claiming the HoA was non-binding, Mr Patel sought (and was granted) specific performance. A good reminder that it’s important for your HoA to be explicitly non-binding if that is your intention.

https://pinpoint.cch.com.au/document/legauUio3697613sl1502889120/patel-v-sengun-investment-holdings-pty-ltd-2023-aplc-23-046

August 9, 2024

Finalist - Property Team of the Year

This recognition is a tribute to all of the hard work carried out by our lawyers and support staff, and also to our wonderful clients who have been a pleasure to work with, and who provide us with such rewarding transactions.

We look forward to enjoying a fun night with our peers at the LawyersWeekly Awards ceremony in August!

 

July 15, 2024

Guarantors Beware

Not all guarantees are created equal: understanding the risks associated with guarantees in property transactions and whether you might be forced to ‘pay the price’ for a purchaser’s non-completion.

https://pinpoint.cch.com.au/document/legauUio3697901sl1503950976/ryan-v-upg-322-pty-ltd-2023-aplc-23-053

June 18, 2024

Legal 500 (Asia Pacific) Guide 2023

Sincere thanks to our wonderful clients and hard-working team for supporting our inclusion in the Legal 500 (Asia Pacific) Guide as a leading firm in Real Estate for 2023

The Legal 500 has been analysing law firm capabilities across the world for more than 3 decades in over 150 jurisdictions. Their research is based on: “feedback from 300,000 clients worldwide, submissions from law firms and interviews with leading private practice lawyers, and a team of researchers who have unrivalled experience in the legal market.”https://www.legal500.com/about-us/

February 10, 2023

"Excellence Awardee" - Boutique Firm of the Year - 2022 Australasian Law Awards

We are delighted that Massons has been selected as an “Excellence Awardee” in the category of “Boutique Firm of the Year” at the 2022 Australasian Law Awards.

Thank you to all of our wonderful clients who have supported our nomination in this category, and to our amazing lawyers and support staff for making this possible!

Wishing all the other Awardees the best of luck and looking forward to the Gala Dinner.  A night out with our team is always cause for celebration – win, lose or draw!!

March 23, 2022

Australia's commercial property law experts

Enquiries

Phone: +61 2 8923 0900
Email: property@massons.com