Written by Ole Mitrevski on July 1, 2017
Under the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) (RLA) “retail premises” are defined to mean premises that are used, or are to be used, wholly or predominately for the sale or hire of goods by retail or the retail provision of services.
So what does this actually mean?
Last year, the case of IMCC Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v CB Cold Storage Ltd  VSCA 178, made it clear that the ‘ultimate consumer’ test is now the principle test to be applied to determine whether a tenant is undertaking a ‘retail’ business for the purposes of the RLA.
As a result of this case, a large number of leases that were previously not thought to be retail, will now be governed by the RLA.
Case law has established that “retail” essentially means the provision of a good or service to the ultimate consumer for a fee or reward.
The “ultimate consumer” does not need to be a member of the public. In other words, it does not matter if the good or service is provided to another business who uses that service for their own business purpose. A business to business transaction could result in retail business.
In short, if the answer to either of the following questions is “yes”, then it is likely that the business will be a retail business and the RLA will apply:
Accordingly, this means that:
It is important to note that including an acknowledgment in your lease that the RLA does not apply will not save you from application of the RLA.
Landlords and tenants should carefully review any leases that may be subject to the RLA and consider if the RLA will apply.
The RLA is generally considered to be “tenant friendly”. In other words, tenants will usually have more protections under a lease governed by the RLA, than one which isn’t.
For those leases that are already on foot, some key things for both parties to consider are:
For those leases that are currently being negotiated, the parties should carefully consider if the RLA will apply and if so, take the provisions of the RLA into account when negotiating clauses. Landlords may wish to narrow the permitted use to make it clear that premises cannot be used for a retail purpose.
If your lease was entered into prior to commencement of the RLA in 2003, it is good idea to speak to a lawyer before agreeing to any variation of that lease (as a variation may result in the RLA applying).
If you suspect that any of your Victorian leases may now be found to be “retail”, and would like further advice on the implications under the RLA, please contact us.
November 21, 2019
Partner, Leisha de Aboitiz and Lawyer, Rachael Bass, recently wrote an article published by the REINSW in relation to recent NSW Government reforms on flammable cladding. Read the article here:
August 13, 2019
We are absolutely delighted to see our Ben Malone recognised in Doyles Guide 2019 in the category of “Property & Real Estate Law Rising Stars – Australia”
June 6, 2019
We are excited that Massons has been recognised once again (and moved up a tier in rankings) in Doyle’s Guide 2019 in the category of “Leading Property & Real Estate Law Firms – NSW”. We are thrilled to be recognised by our peers for doing what we love to do! To add to our excitement, our Jodie Masson and Leisha de Aboitiz have both been recommended in the category of “Leading Property & Real Estate Lawyers – NSW” and Jodie has also been recommended in the category of “Leading Leasing Lawyers – NSW”. What an amazing week – we haven’t stopped smiling!
May 15, 2019
Massons was delighted to work with the exceptional team at the City of Sydney in its recent acquisition of the iconic heritage listed Customs House from The Commonwealth of Australia
April 1, 2019
It has been a big week for Massons! We are excited to be nominated as a finalist in the 2019 Australasian Law Awards “Law Firm of the Year (1-100 Lawyers)” category. Thank you to all of our amazing staff and valued clients for helping us to achieve this recognition.
March 28, 2019