Written by Leila Packett and Leisha de Aboitiz on October 25, 2016
Strata owners in NSW will no longer be held to ransom by minority interests under changes to the collective sale and renewal process in the Strata Schemes Development Act.
I. PLANNING |
||||||
Stage 1 –Proposal submitted |
Any person may give a written proposal for a collective sale or redevelopment to the owner’s corporation. The strata committee must consider the proposal within 30 days and determine whether it warrants further consideration. If the answer is: |
|||||
Yes[1] The proposal proceeds to a general meeting of the owners’ corporation.Proceed to Stage 2 |
No[2] The proposal will lapse after 44 days.Process ends |
|||||
Stage 2 – Committee Established |
A strata renewal committee is elected to operate independently of the owners’ corporation. It is governed by guidelines and thresholds set by the owners’ corporation and the SSD Act with respect to budget, third party involvement, meeting procedures etc. |
|||||
Stage 3 – Plan prepared |
A strata renewal plan is prepared by the committee in accordance with the SSD Act, which sets out mandatory content for the plan and minimum compensation requirements for dissenting owners.[3] |
|||||
Stage 4 –Plan distributed, amended or abandoned |
The completed plan is presented to a general meeting of the owners’ corporation. The owners’ corporation can: |
|||||
Pass a special resolution[4] to distribute the plan to all owners for consideration.Proceed to Stage 5 |
Return the plan for amendment by the committee.Go back to
|
Decide not to distribute the plan or amend it.The plan lapses |
||||
II. VOTING |
||||||
Stage 5 –Plan considered by all owners |
An owner in support of the plan must return a support notice that has been properly executed.[5] The ‘required level of support’ to proceed is 75% of the total number of owners (exc. utility lots). If this level is: |
|||||
Reached è The owners’ corporation must then notify lot owners and the Registrar General[6]
|
Not reached èThe plan lapses 3 months after distribution.Process ends |
|||||
III. APPLICATION TO COURT |
||||||
Stage 6 – Application to the Court |
The owners’ corporation must decide whether to apply to the Land and Environment Court for an order giving effect to the plan. They can: |
|||||
Pass a general resolution to apply for an order è Notice given to all tenants & application made in accordance with SSD Act.Proceed to Stage 7 |
Decide not to apply for order.The plan lapses.Process Ends. |
|||||
Stage 7- Consideration by Court |
The Court must hear and consider the application having regard to s181 of the SSD Act, and must make a decision in accordance with s182 of the SSD Act. Certain persons may object to the application (eg a dissenting owner, mortgagee etc), and there are certain protections for dissenting owners regarding costs incurred in relation to the proceedings.The Court can: |
|||||
Make orders giving effect to the collective sale or redevelopment plan.Proceed to Stage 8 |
Dismiss the application.Process Ends |
|||||
IV. TERMINATION OF SCHEME |
||||||
Stage 8 – Termination Order |
The effect of an order is set out in the SSD Act, guiding timing of termination, lot owner obligations etc. Rights and remedies for the termination of leases may arise.A Court order will attach to the land and be binding on all owners in the scheme, irrespective of whether they supported the collective sale or redevelopment. |
|||||
[1] Or a ‘qualified request’ is received – A request from one or more owners in a scheme with unit entitlement which total more than 25% of the aggregate unit entitlements for the scheme.
[2] And a ‘qualified request’ is not received – see footnote 1.
[3] In accordance with s55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991.
[4] Not more than 25% of the value of votes cast are against the resolution, having regard to the specific requirements in s5 of the SSM Act.
[5] By all registered owners, mortgagees and covenant chargees with respect to the lot.
[6] A recording will be made on the folio of the common property, and subsequent owners and mortgagees will be bound by a support notice.
When reviewing the case of T&L Alexandria v Sharvain Facades (2023) the court ruled on a vague “make good” clause, where unclear wording led to a costly dispute over redecorating obligations. The key takeaway? Ambiguity in leases — especially around make-good clauses — can cause headaches. Be clear and specific in your contracts to avoid messy surprises.
December 16, 2024
Be careful when asking for a “non-refundable” deposit in a heads of agreement that has all the hallmarks of a binding contract, it might just lock you in to the deal. In this case Mr. Patel paid a non-refundable $50,000 deposit under an HoA, and when the vendor withdrew claiming the HoA was non-binding, Mr Patel sought (and was granted) specific performance. A good reminder that it’s important for your HoA to be explicitly non-binding if that is your intention.
https://pinpoint.cch.com.au/document/legauUio3697613sl1502889120/patel-v-sengun-investment-holdings-pty-ltd-2023-aplc-23-046
August 9, 2024
This recognition is a tribute to all of the hard work carried out by our lawyers and support staff, and also to our wonderful clients who have been a pleasure to work with, and who provide us with such rewarding transactions.
We look forward to enjoying a fun night with our peers at the LawyersWeekly Awards ceremony in August!
July 15, 2024
Not all guarantees are created equal: understanding the risks associated with guarantees in property transactions and whether you might be forced to ‘pay the price’ for a purchaser’s non-completion.
June 18, 2024
Sincere thanks to our wonderful clients and hard-working team for supporting our inclusion in the Legal 500 (Asia Pacific) Guide as a leading firm in Real Estate for 2023
The Legal 500 has been analysing law firm capabilities across the world for more than 3 decades in over 150 jurisdictions. Their research is based on: “feedback from 300,000 clients worldwide, submissions from law firms and interviews with leading private practice lawyers, and a team of researchers who have unrivalled experience in the legal market.” – https://www.legal500.com/about-us/
February 10, 2023
We are delighted that Massons has been selected as an “Excellence Awardee” in the category of “Boutique Firm of the Year” at the 2022 Australasian Law Awards.
Thank you to all of our wonderful clients who have supported our nomination in this category, and to our amazing lawyers and support staff for making this possible!
Wishing all the other Awardees the best of luck and looking forward to the Gala Dinner. A night out with our team is always cause for celebration – win, lose or draw!!
March 23, 2022