Written by Ole Mitrevski on May 21, 2020
By way of update, South Australia has repealed the sections relating to commercial leases in the COVID Act and Regulations that we advised on earlier and have replaced them.
Please see the new COVID Emergency Response Act 2020 (the Act) and COVID-19 Emergency Response (Commercial Leases No 2) Regulations 2020 (the Regulations).
The Act and Regulations have retrospective application and apply from 30 March 2020 and end on 30 September 2020.
The Act now provides for the Governor to make regulations regarding commercial leases and all the operative provisions regarding commercial leases are in the Regulations.
The main difference seems to be a limitation on which leases the regulations apply to and the imposition of a turnover threshold in relation to who is an ‘affected tenant’, which wasn’t included previously. There are also some additional dispute resolution clauses.
For ease of reference, we have set out below the updated position in South Australia.
The Regulations do not apply to a lease entered into after the commencement of the prescribed period (ie after 30 March 2020), unless that lease was entered into as a result of an option or an extension / renewal on similar terms.
The provisions of every commercial lease is taken to be modified to the extent necessary to give effect to the operation of the Act.
The parties to a commercial lease must make a genuine attempt to negotiate in good faith the rent payable and any other terms of the lease. This seems to apply to all leases (whether or not the tenant is an affected tenant – see below).
An ‘affected tenant’ is defined to be a tenant that is suffering financial hardship as a result of COVID-19 (ie is eligible for JobKeeper) and has a turnover of less and $50 million (there are some additional provisions regarding how to calculate turnover).
If a tenant is an affected tenant, the landlord cannot take any ‘prescribed action’ against the tenant if the breach consists of:
If the tenant is required to do something under the laws of the State as a result of COVID-19 (eg is required to close as a result of a public health order), then this is not a breach of the lease and the landlord cannot do any of the following:
If the landlord had started any of the above actions during the period 30 March 2020 and 9 April 2020 but they had not been finalised, then that action is suspended until the Act no longer applies.
Interestingly, this seems to apply even if the tenant is not an affected lessee, so long as the ‘lessee is suffering financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic’ (ie eligible for JobKeeper).
If a tenant is an affected tenant, the rent must not be increased during the prescribed period (excluding turnover rent) unless agreed between the parties.
If a tenant is an affected tenant, a tenant is not required to pay land tax or reimburse the landlord for the payment of land tax (where the lease requires a tenant to pay) during the prescribed period.
The parties can apply for mediation and the Court (if mediation is unsuccessful) in relation to any disputes that have arisen as a result of COVID-19. However a tenant cannot apply for mediation unless it is an affected tenant.
When reviewing the case of T&L Alexandria v Sharvain Facades (2023) the court ruled on a vague “make good” clause, where unclear wording led to a costly dispute over redecorating obligations. The key takeaway? Ambiguity in leases — especially around make-good clauses — can cause headaches. Be clear and specific in your contracts to avoid messy surprises.
December 16, 2024
Be careful when asking for a “non-refundable” deposit in a heads of agreement that has all the hallmarks of a binding contract, it might just lock you in to the deal. In this case Mr. Patel paid a non-refundable $50,000 deposit under an HoA, and when the vendor withdrew claiming the HoA was non-binding, Mr Patel sought (and was granted) specific performance. A good reminder that it’s important for your HoA to be explicitly non-binding if that is your intention.
https://pinpoint.cch.com.au/document/legauUio3697613sl1502889120/patel-v-sengun-investment-holdings-pty-ltd-2023-aplc-23-046
August 9, 2024
This recognition is a tribute to all of the hard work carried out by our lawyers and support staff, and also to our wonderful clients who have been a pleasure to work with, and who provide us with such rewarding transactions.
We look forward to enjoying a fun night with our peers at the LawyersWeekly Awards ceremony in August!
July 15, 2024
Not all guarantees are created equal: understanding the risks associated with guarantees in property transactions and whether you might be forced to ‘pay the price’ for a purchaser’s non-completion.
June 18, 2024
Sincere thanks to our wonderful clients and hard-working team for supporting our inclusion in the Legal 500 (Asia Pacific) Guide as a leading firm in Real Estate for 2023
The Legal 500 has been analysing law firm capabilities across the world for more than 3 decades in over 150 jurisdictions. Their research is based on: “feedback from 300,000 clients worldwide, submissions from law firms and interviews with leading private practice lawyers, and a team of researchers who have unrivalled experience in the legal market.” – https://www.legal500.com/about-us/
February 10, 2023
We are delighted that Massons has been selected as an “Excellence Awardee” in the category of “Boutique Firm of the Year” at the 2022 Australasian Law Awards.
Thank you to all of our wonderful clients who have supported our nomination in this category, and to our amazing lawyers and support staff for making this possible!
Wishing all the other Awardees the best of luck and looking forward to the Gala Dinner. A night out with our team is always cause for celebration – win, lose or draw!!
March 23, 2022